Last week a friend of mine made an intriguing comment on Twitter "Not sure how I feel about U2 being referred to as "classic rock" on #Glee
" I understood her feeling, but I did comment that U2's Boy
came out in 1980, over 30 years ago - however, she felt that the song 'One' really isn't classic rock. That got me thinking about music and how we classify things. On this point I had to agree with her: to me, U2 (especially Achtung Baby
and albums that followed) should not be considered Classic Rock.
It comes down to how we classify things. Music has always been classified into different genres - Alternative, Grunge, Hair Metal, Pop, Country, etc. What becomes complicated is when we try to break it down by an age or time divisions. Things such as "classic rock" or "old-school rap" because who decides if something should be considered in those divisions?
Let's take Classic Rock for example. What standard should be used for determining what is and what isn't classic rock? Is it a certain age? If so, then do we just put any type of musical genre after a certain amount of time into that category? If that is the case, then we are really starting to bunch things up.
Let's take a look at three different albums from about the same time to see this example at work: R.E.M.'s Out of Time, Pearl Jam's Ten
and Poison's Flesh & Blood
. All three albums came out between 1990 and 1991, yet you couldn't find three different genres as these three. However, if we use age as the determinant for something, they can all be considered "classic rock" now and that just doesn't seem right.
Maybe I'm just getting old and still think classic should just be bands like Led Zeppelin
, Pink Floyd
and anything between 1965 and 1980 - because before 1965 is more Oldies and after 1980 is well...80's music.
My point in all of this rambling is that we have to be cautious when we label things. Communication is all about the language that we use. That is why you should be careful when you label something. I'm sure Glee didn't mean anything by it, but I am sure there were a lot of people my age and older who don't consider U2's one as classic rock. However, to someone in high school, it might sound like an oldie. Such is the problem with age I guess.




The key differentiation between "classic rock" and other branded versions of rock music is that it predated the first-wave punk movement in the late 1970s. While other forms of music coexisted alongside "classic rock" (psychedelia, funk, prog to name a few), they all fall within the same governing spectrum of classic rock music and are hence referred to as such. Typically, rock music which followed the aforementioned punk movement is referred to as "new wave" or "post-punk", neither term of which is very descriptive. But then again, by this logic, neither is "classic rock". Your initial comment that U2 shouldn't be considered "classic rock" is completely correct: while they performed rock music, they were unquestionably influenced by the English punk movement (the Jam in particular) and do not ascribe to the same era in musical history as Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, etc.
So yes, I concur. But why would you ever watch Glee to fill out your musical education?
Posted by: Sam | Monday, May 24, 2010 at 03:55 PM
Excellent point Sam - I don't think people know a lot about the history of music and how much punk music influenced it.
And I don't watch glee - especially to fill out my musical education :)
Posted by: Travis | Monday, May 24, 2010 at 05:20 PM
The classic rock stations re-create the sound of album oriented rock stations of the 60s-70's.New versions has been made from 1980 up to present.There are variations like hard rock but still the concept of rock was there.
Posted by: wheel balancer | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 06:30 AM